<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hypo-theses &#187; Geodiversity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/tag/geodiversity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hypocentral.com/blog</link>
	<description>Greek: proposals, suppositions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Geodiversity</title>
		<link>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2012/01/11/geodiversity/</link>
		<comments>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2012/01/11/geodiversity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hypocentre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fieldwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoconservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geodiversity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocentral.com/blog/?p=1293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been out the last couple of days undertaking fieldwork for a building stones project, but today I was treated to a glimpse of a gem of a little geological section being prepared. Those of us who work in geoconservation talk a lot about geodiversity but this must be the most geodiverse section I <a href='http://hypocentral.com/blog/2012/01/11/geodiversity/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been out the last couple of days undertaking fieldwork for a building stones project, but today I was treated to a glimpse of a gem of a little geological section being prepared. Those of us who work in geoconservation talk a lot about geodiversity but this must be the most geodiverse section I have come across.  It is a trench, only about 100m long but displays rocks from the Precambrian, Cambrian, Silurian, Carboniferous and Triassic.</p>
<p>The trench runs across the crest of the &#8216;Malvern Axis&#8217;, a major monoclinal fold trending north-south through central England that brings up Precambrian (~677 Ma; Cryogenian) to the surface.  The Malvern line separates the two Precambrian terranes of the Midlands Microcraton, Wrekin Terrane to the west and Charnian Terrane to the east, that forms the solid basement of England. These Precambrian igneous rocks are unconformably overlain by Middle Cambrian Malvern Quartzite, and then Upper Silurian (Pridoli) Raglan Mudstone, and Upper Carboniferous (Moscovian) Halesowen Fm. This sequence was folded and thrust during the Variscan Orogeny at the end of the Carboniferous into the north-south Malvern Axis.  Extension during the Triassic produced normal faulting along the Malvern Line and deposition of Middle Triassic (Anisian) Bromsgrove Sandstone to the east in the Worcester Graben. All this is being exposed in just one 100m trench, albeit somewhat tectonically shortened.</p>
<p><a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Worcester073.jpg"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Worcester073.jpg" alt="" title="Malvern 1" width="683" height="1024" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1294" /></a></p>
<p>Standing on the axis, this is the view to the east. In the trench, the light coloured material in the foreground is Precambrian Malvern Complex, succeeded by grey/green and grey Carboniferous, red Silurian muds and Triassic sands towards the car.</p>
<p><a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Worcester072.jpg"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Worcester072.jpg" alt="" title="Malvern 2" width="1024" height="683" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1295" /></a></p>
<p>To the west, the white is Cambrian followed by Carboniferous and Silurian on the other side of the axis.  Note that many of the lithological identifications are still tentative.  </p>
<p>The section is still in the process of being created and is on private land, but should be stunning when finished.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2012/01/11/geodiversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark Days For British Geoconservation</title>
		<link>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2011/11/20/dark-days-for-british-geoconservation/</link>
		<comments>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2011/11/20/dark-days-for-british-geoconservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hypocentre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geoconservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geodiversity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocentral.com/blog/?p=1259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are some troubling times in British Geoconservation with several geoconservation sites around the country coming under attack from various sources. First, let&#8217;s start close to home at Park Hall, Staffordshire. [image: Kidderminster Fm, Park Hall, Staffordshire. source: Ian G. Stimpson] Park Hall is a SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and National Nature Reserve <a href='http://hypocentral.com/blog/2011/11/20/dark-days-for-british-geoconservation/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some troubling times in British Geoconservation with several geoconservation sites around the country coming under attack from various sources.</p>
<p>First, let&#8217;s start close to home at Park Hall, Staffordshire. </p>
<p><a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/park_hall.jpg"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/park_hall.jpg" alt="" title="Park Hall Kidderminster Fm" width="640" height="640" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1260" /></a><br />
<em>[image: Kidderminster Fm, Park Hall, Staffordshire. source: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hypocentre/4404551159/">Ian G. Stimpson</a>]</em></p>
<p>Park Hall is a SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and National Nature Reserve (NNR) for its geology (Lower Triassic Kidderminster Formation [formerly known as the Bunter Pebble Beds]) exposed in former aggregate quarries.  Situated on the edge of Stoke-on-Trent its Visitor Centre hosted visits from school children to study the local geology and biology. The GeoconservationUK Education Project [<a href="http://www.ukrigs.org.uk/esos/wiki/index.php5?title=Main_Page">Earth Science On-Site</a>] uses former aggregates sites like <a href="http://www.ukrigs.org.uk/esos/wiki/index.php5?title=PH">Park Hall</a> to develop examples of high quality Earth Science field teaching activities for schools. Education for primary school students in Stoke-on-Trent is some of the <a href="http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/7-year-olds-rank-worst-country/story-13448129-detail/story.html">worst in the country</a>. It is hard to get schools to get the children outdoors and studying their natural environment but Park Hall Visitor Centre was a success. Instead of the centre having to chase the schools, the schools contacted the centre.  Many had repeat visits booked annually in their diaries.  Then on the night of November 6 thoughtless vandals broke into the centre, set a fire and razed it to the ground.  The conflagration took with it tens of thousands of pounds worth of education materials for the school children of Stoke-on-Trent and the wider area.</p>
<p><a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkhall.jpg"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkhall-1024x766.jpg" alt="" title="Park Hall Visitors Centre - as was" width="695" height="519" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1261" /></a><br />
<em>[image: Demolition work at the Park Hall vistor centre after the fire. source: John Reynolds]</em></p>
<p>Other display material was lost including examples of local Carboniferous Coal Measure plant fossils had been lost in the blaze.  It is the shear mindless thuggery of it all that saddens me. They also targeted a <a href="http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/Arson-attacks-destroy-buildings-inside-60-minutes/story-13788393-detail/story.html">saddlery and several horses could easily have died</a>. </p>
<p>Attempts are now under way to try to persuade Stoke-on-Trent City Council to rebuild the centre and have geology teaching as a showcase part of the new centre.  However, in these straitened times it is always possible that this will prove impossible. </p>
<p>Another Earth Science On-Site location on the Kidderminster Formation has also been targeted by vandals.  Barr Beacon, Walsall has had its war memorial roof stripped of copper by metal thieves.  Whilst not affecting the geology of the site, including the Staffordshire Tixall Stone used for the memorial steps, this is still sickening. </p>
<p><a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/BarrBeacon.jpg"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/BarrBeacon.jpg" alt="" title="Barr Beacon" width="475" height="323" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1263" /></a><br />
[image: Barr Beacon War Memorial targeted by metal thieves : source <a href="http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2011/11/01/war-memorials-protected-from-metal-thieves/">Express and Star</a>]</p>
<p>From England to Scotland where they have been having their own problems.  On the beautiful Isle of Skye, perhaps more famous for its igneous rocks than its sedimentary ones, there are exposures of fossiliferous Jurassic rocks that have yielded the only Scottish dinosaur remains.  Bearreraig Bay, north of Portree, is another SSSI, where any collecting is limited to that for scientific use, and that by permission only. Those convicted for either damaging a SSSI or collecting without permission can be <a href="http://adlib.everysite.co.uk/adlib/defra/content.aspx?doc=59645&#038;id=59668">subject to an unlimited fine</a>. The section appears to have been attacked with a crowbar with several tonnes of rock moved in an attempt to extract fossils and dinosaur footprints may also have been removed from Valtos. </p>
<p><a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/syke_snh.jpg"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/syke_snh.jpg" alt="" title="syke_snh" width="464" height="261" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1264" /></a><br />
[image: Damaged fossils at Bearreraig Bay. source: <a href="http://www.snh.gov.uk/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/index.jsp?id=622">Scottish Natural Heritage</a> / BBC] </p>
<p>It would appear that the recession is driving a minority to increasing levels of theft, be it metals or fossil material.  Another sign of the recession is the loss of UNESCO Geopark status by the <a href="http://www.lochabergeopark.org.uk/index.asp">Lochaber Geopark</a>. UNESCO require that a permanent project officer be employed.  It has been increasingly difficult to obtain funds for geoconservation funding.  Where I am in Staffordshire all regular sources of funding have dried up (or appropriated by the national government), so it is little surprise that the volunteers in Scotland have struggled to raise the money for a salaried member of staff.  This is the real <a href="http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/big-society">Big Society</a>, volunteers working for the good of the community and it is failing through lack of proper funding and support.</p>
<p>The Lochaber Geopark includes Glen Roy with its famous &#8220;parallel roads&#8221;, the shorelines of glacially dammed lakes.  Charles Darwin visited Glen Roy in 1838 and described it as &#8220;far the most remarkable area I ever examined.&#8221; Darwin, however, was a much better geologist than a glaciologist, and ascribed the roads to marine effects.</p>
<p>The general mood in British geoconservation is on a downer.  Funding has largely dried up and the government&#8217;s new planning laws appear to be ignoring any special consideration of local geodiversity or biodiversity sites. And, to top it all, the government has issued a new White Paper, the first such on the natural environment in over twenty years, called <a href="http://www.archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/natural/documents/newp-white-paper-110607.pdf">Natural Choice</a>. It fails to mention &#8216;geology, geoconservation or geodiversity&#8217; anywhere in the document.  Here is their definition of &#8216;natural environment&#8217; </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In this White Paper, we have given ‘natural environment’ a broad meaning <em>[sic]</em>. wildlife, rivers and streams, lakes and seas, urban green space and open countryside, forests and farmed land. It includes the fundamentals of human survival: our food, fuel, air and water, together with the natural systems that cycle our water, clean out pollutants, produce healthy soil, protect us from floods and regulate our climate. And it embraces our landscapes and our natural heritage, the many types of contact we have with nature in both town and country.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The definition simply isn&#8217;t broad enough. Perhaps they should have used <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_environment">Wikipedia</a> </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The natural environment encompasses <strong>all</strong> living <strong>and non-living</strong> things&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>The lack of mention of geodiversity means that councils are already cutting back on their geoconservation work as they say that it isn&#8217;t now covered by government thinking.</p>
<p>At the moment those of us who work in geoconservation are feeling unloved, underfunded and under attack.  Dark days indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2011/11/20/dark-days-for-british-geoconservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extreme Gardening</title>
		<link>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/11/15/extreme-gardening/</link>
		<comments>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/11/15/extreme-gardening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hypocentre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staffordshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geodiversity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocentral.com/blog/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend I&#8217;ve been involved in a bit of geoconservation work a.k.a. extreme gardening. Working with the Staffordshire RIGS group, we were cleaning up a couple of outcrops along the Hamps and Manifold Geotrail at a site called Ladyside Wood (Location 19 on the map below). The parent body of Staffordshire RIGS, UKRIGS (UK Regionally <a href='http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/11/15/extreme-gardening/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend I&#8217;ve been involved in a bit of geoconservation work a.k.a. extreme gardening. Working with the <a href="http://www.esci.keele.ac.uk/srigs/">Staffordshire RIGS</a> group, we were cleaning up a couple of outcrops along the <a href="http://www.esci.keele.ac.uk/srigs/Geotrails/HampsManifold/index.html">Hamps and Manifold Geotrail</a> at a site called Ladyside Wood (Location 19 on the map below).  The parent body of Staffordshire RIGS, <a href="http://www.ukrigs.org.uk/html/ukrigs.php">UKRIGS</a> (UK Regionally Important Geological / Geomorphological Sites) has just changed its name to GeoconservationUK. Personally I think that this is a poor choice as the RIGS groups do so much more than geoconservation.  I would have preferred GeodiversityUK which would have given a feel for the range of things that we do.   </p>
<p>But anyway, back to the Manifold Valley &#8230;  </p>
<div id="attachment_790" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 560px"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ossums.png" alt="Part of the Hamps and Manifold Geotrail - Ladyside Wood #19" title="Part of the Hamps and Manifold Geotrail - Staffordshire RIGS" width="550" height="423" class="size-full wp-image-790" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Part of the Hamps and Manifold Geotrail - Ladyside Wood #19</p></div>
<p>The map shows that the Ladyside Wood locality should display the transition from the reef knoll facies of the Milldale Limestone (purple), through the bedded facies of the Milldale (dark blue) to the overlying bedded Ecton Limestones (pale blue).  Unfortunately the sections have become somewhat overgrown.</p>
<div id="attachment_791" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2009Manifold02.JPG" alt="Milldale Limestone section before geoconservation " title="Milldale Before" width="1024" height="768" class="size-full wp-image-791" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Milldale Limestone section before geoconservation </p></div>
<div id="attachment_792" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2009Manifold06.JPG" alt="Ecton Limestone section before geoconservation" title="Ecton Before" width="1024" height="768" class="size-full wp-image-792" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ecton Limestone section before geoconservation</p></div>
<p>Often in geoconservation we find that there is a certain tension between the geoconservationists who want to expose the outcrops and the bioconservationists who want to preserve certain plants.  Before starting clearance on this section we consulted with the National Trust who own the land.  Can you spot what was the only plant they asked us to leave? OK, I admit it is difficult from the photos but the answer is the yellowish shrub on the right of the lower image.  The bizarre thing is that is a flowering red currant &#8211; a garden shrub and not even native to Britain.  Apparently it looks pretty when it flowers!</p>
<p>Anyway, after five hours of pruning, scraping, sawing and scrubbing, we managed to get the outcrops returned to some of their former glory.</p>
<div id="attachment_794" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2009Manifold10.JPG" alt="Milldale Limestone section after geoconservation" title="Milldale After" width="1024" height="768" class="size-full wp-image-794" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Milldale Limestone section after geoconservation</p></div>
<div id="attachment_795" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/2009Manifold09.JPG" alt="Ecton Limestone section after geoconservation" title="Ecton After" width="1024" height="768" class="size-full wp-image-795" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ecton Limestone section after geoconservation</p></div>
<p>This is the first of what I hope to be many geoconservation sessions to be run by Staffordshire RIGS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/11/15/extreme-gardening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong Rock II</title>
		<link>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/09/05/wrong-rock-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/09/05/wrong-rock-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hypocentre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Staffordshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocentral.com/blog/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just finished preparing a presentation I&#8217;m giving at the 15th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics of the Near Surface Geoscience Division of EAGE (or Near Surface 2009). I&#8217;m so used to talking for a micro-century (~50 minutes) in lectures, it is hard to discipline one&#8217;s self to a 15 minute slot. But, <a href='http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/09/05/wrong-rock-ii/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just finished preparing a presentation I&#8217;m giving at the 15th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics of the Near Surface Geoscience Division of EAGE (or <a href="http://www.eage.org/events/index.php?eventid=110&#038;Opendivs=s3">Near Surface 2009</a>).  I&#8217;m so used to talking for a micro-century (~50 minutes) in lectures, it is hard to discipline one&#8217;s self to a 15 minute slot.  </p>
<p>But, before I head of to Dublin, there is just time for the latest instalment of &#8220;<a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/12/wrong-rock/">Wrong Rock</a>&#8220;. Last Time I discussed a church that had a new extension being built in a rock type that didn&#8217;t match the original.  I also noted that the disused quarry that had supplied the original building was less that a kilometre away and it would have been much better from both an aesthetic and &#8216;stone miles&#8217; point of view if a way could have been found to re-open that quarry to supply the stone for the church.  This week I have uncovered what I consider to be an even bigger crime against stone.</p>
<p><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/SSSS047.JPG" alt="Another Staffordshire Church" title="Another Staffordshire Church" width="640" height="480" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-711" /></p>
<p>Like most old churches it was originally built from the local rock, in this case the Lower Triassic Kidderminster Formation (in old nomenclature Bunter Pebble Beds) which as the old name suggests is a coarse, pebbly sandstone.  Again, the original quarry is close by, less than 500 metres from the church. This time it isn&#8217;t the modern extension (which is round the back) that I&#8217;m railing against, but the repair work on the original. These repairs have been done with Triassic Hollington Stone (formerly Lower Keuper Sandstone) which I&#8217;ve discussed <a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/02/hollington/">before</a>. It might not look too bad from a distance, but close up it really clashes.</p>
<p><img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/SSSS052.JPG" alt="Repair work" title="Repair work" width="640" height="480" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-712" /></p>
<p>What is worse, is the nature of the repair.  Rather than being flush with the existing stones, the steps on the top of the replaced blocks will collect water and cause the old stone block above it to weather even faster.  And this is on a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listed_building">Grade One Listed Building</a>, &#8220;a building of outstanding architectural or historic interest&#8221;. Special permission is required for repairs and particular materials are usually specified (although churches with current worship do have some exemptions).  How much better the repairs would have been if the local stone had been specified and the replacement stone fitted flush with the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/09/05/wrong-rock-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong Rock</title>
		<link>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/12/wrong-rock/</link>
		<comments>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/12/wrong-rock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hypocentre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Staffordshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypocentral.com/blog/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d like to introduce the concept of &#8216;stone miles&#8217;. A bit like &#8216;food miles&#8217;, building stones are often transported great distances (in some cases halfway around the world) when local ones will do, often much better. David Williams from &#8216;Stories in Stone&#8216; recently posted about the slate used for the new café at the top <a href='http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/12/wrong-rock/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to introduce the concept of &#8216;stone miles&#8217;.  A bit like &#8216;food miles&#8217;, building stones are often transported great distances (in some cases halfway around the world) when local ones will do, often much better.  David Williams from &#8216;<a href="http://stories-in-stone.blogspot.com/2009/08/slow-stone-on-snowdon.html">Stories in Stone</a>&#8216; recently posted about the slate used for the new café at the top of Mt. Snowdon in Wales being made not of Welsh slate but of Portuguese. The problem is that British planning laws make quarrying difficult and expensive.  Yesterday I came across an example of where this is having repercussions even on a small county scale.</p>
<p>Here is a lovely old church in the Staffordshire Moorlands having an extension built &#8211; can you spot the problem?<br />
<img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Peaks090001.jpg" alt="Moorlands Church" title="Moorlands Church" width="640" height="853" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-664" /></p>
<p>The main church is made of the local bedrock, the Rough Rock (Carboniferous, Upper Namurian [OK, Lower Bashkirian if you insist] in age).  It is not hard to track down the original quarry that supplied the stone. It is only ~500 metres away, now overgrown but otherwise OK. This is what the Rough Rock looks like &#8230;<br />
<img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Peaks090002.jpg" alt="Rough Rock" title="Rough Rock" width="640" height="480" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-665" /></p>
<p>The problem is the extension is being built from Hollington Mottled Stone.  I&#8217;ve discussed the <a href="http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/02/hollington/">Hollington Stone</a> before, it is a Lower Triassic sandstone and looks like this &#8211; spot the difference?<br />
<img src="http://hypocentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/hol11.jpg" alt="Hollington Stone" title="Hollington Stone" width="640" height="483" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-666" /></p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not criticising the church.  They have used the most locally available currently quarried building stone, it even comes from the same county, but it is the wrong rock and it doesn&#8217;t match.  When it weathers it will become a closer match in terms of colour, but in terms of grain size and texture it simply isn&#8217;t right.</p>
<p>The Rough Rock is no longer quarried in Staffordshire for building stone.  It is quarried where it is less well cemented, for glass sand, but that is another story. It is a shame that planning laws are such that it is simply uneconomic to reopen the original quarry to take a limited amount of stone for a heritage project that will be a perfect match to the church stone.</p>
<p>Britain is rapidly loosing it&#8217;s geodiversity. In Staffordshire about 25 different rock types were locally quarried for buildings. We are now down to two, and one of those isn&#8217;t really suited to much beyond drystone walling repairs.  It is very sad to see local historical heritage buildings being added to with the wrong rock simply because it is the closest available match going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hypocentral.com/blog/2009/08/12/wrong-rock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

